🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an observance that started out as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has developed a commercial tone, expanding to include events where Black people are compensated to speak with white audiences about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The tide has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the UK, Deutschland, Éire and the Holland.

The month has developed since that time, placing less emphasis on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and more on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the observance is commemorated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels empowered to say that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, far-right parties are growing in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the US, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the country. A effort to erase the history of people of color and narrative from the historical documents is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the month illustrates how insufficiently it can be influential if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered festivities of historical achievements, rather than challenging the conditions of the present. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. An academic expert, a professor at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just eliminate events including Black History Month entirely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an era that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an framework that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as various establishments are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not evade politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What use is basic knowledge of the history when it fails to address the present reality of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Institutions who observe it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and awareness of minor insults, but challenged by the threats that affect everyone if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and responsive. Perhaps an total re-identification is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.