Fortnite Community Voice Displeasure Over New Sidekick Pets and Alleged Monetization Tactics

Some Fortnite players are experiencing disappointed, and it's not because of recent virtual events. Fortnite's current limited-time event, which brings a Springfield map, also unveiled a fresh feature known as sidekicks. There's no ignore that the new companions are adorable. However, the associated prices have left numerous players stunned at the developer's efforts to profit from nearly every aspect of the game.

Understanding Sidekicks?

Companions are basically similar to Pokémon, though having some drawbacks. Players can name them, and these pets will accompany your character throughout a game. They are indestructible, and you can pet them. Opposing gamers not in your party cannot view these pets — and displaying one's animal friends is arguably half the fun of having them. Pets are able to be outfitted with costumes and gestures, however the debate centers on their appearance. Each sidekick's overall design is only able to be changed one time, at which point that selection is final. You can select a sidekick's fur shade, accent hues, eye colors, markings, and its body type.

The Costly Personalization System

If a player later decide that you want their sidekick to look a bit altered, you cannot just continue to modify its look. Players must buy another sidekick. And, these pets aren't inexpensive. The majority of people are getting the Peels pet, since it is included in this season's reward track. Based on unofficial reports, upcoming pets could cost anywhere between 1,000 to 1,500 V-Bucks; to put that in perspective, 1,000 V-Bucks is priced at $8.99 and 2,800 V-Bucks are $22.99. You can rename a sidekick as many times as you'd like.

Player Reaction and Parallels

The majority of sidekicks have not been formally launched so far, so the pricing could well be adjusted. Yet regardless of whether the developer sets sidekicks cheaper, a lot of the frustration stems from the fact that gamers could have to spend for a one type of pet more than once. To certain players, the cost structure seems particularly egregious considering the developer has previously added companions that are carried around as part of back blings. Back bling companions lack a restriction on changes and are visible by other participants in the game. Backpack pets can't be named or perform emotes, but other gamers can sometimes interact with them — and this is more favorable than remaining invisible completely.

Lack of special features and limited interaction options have many gamers feeling underwhelmed. For instance, why is it not possible to you, such as, play fetch with their stylish banana dog? Some note that sidekicks do not always keep up with the user if a match is fast-paced, or observe that the banana pet occupies two spots in the reward system — which supports the notion that the company is squeezing the community for revenue. Greedy is a word that's appearing frequently in such conversations, with a number of likening pet pricing to other intense pricing schemes in games like EA Sports FC. It also adds to the issue that some pets are expected to be more expensive than equivalent character skin versions.

"We urge you to avoid buy Companion Pets," pleads a popular online thread that encourages other gamers to figuratively vote with their wallets.

"We understand these pets are cute," the post continues, "we realize they are enjoyable. We are aware we have all been anticipating them. But the monetization focus being shown is unacceptable and should not be rewarded."

A Broader Picture of In-Game Spending

In recent years, the game's events and partnerships have grown in scope and ambition, but the no-cost-to-start game still needs to generate revenue. As such, the total quantity of cosmetics users can now purchase has grown nearly overwhelming. In addition to basics like back accessories, gliders, pickaxes, and emotes, players might possibly use money on shoes, songs, musical tools, building blocks, vehicles, tires, vehicle drift colors, seasonal rewards, and a subscription. Companion pets do not just require money, but also introduce a range of new revenue options for the company. It is likely, users will before long be in a position to spend for things like pet appearances, costumes, emotes, and further engagement features.

Every one of these customization items are entirely voluntary and not necessary to enjoy the experience, yet equipment can still affect your social interactions. Younger players, for instance, sometimes encounter teasing for not wearing flashy enough skins. A similar situation previously transpired when the developer introduced licensed shoes, which may be priced from 600 to 1,000 V-Bucks. That footwear cost model wasn't popular as well, and some fans promised that they wouldn't fall prey to the temptation back then. However ultimately, purchasing shoes became commonplace. Now, sidekicks are further pushing the boundaries of how much a player might be prepared to spend to be distinctive amongst the crowd.

What is Ahead for Companion Pets?

Pets are currently a relatively recent addition, and they're part of a game that updates frequently. Some players are sharing that they have received a survey that gauges how the community feel about sidekick functionality and monetization, and this might possibly mean that the company's strategy are remain fluid. Yet if Fortnite shoes are any indication, sidekicks likely won't get cheaper in general — instead, there may be a wider range of costs to choose from.

Ultimately, while some players are raging at the game shop prices, others are experiencing nothing but joy for their new battle royale pals.

Melinda Lane
Melinda Lane

Elin is a business strategist with over a decade of experience in helping startups scale and established companies innovate in the Nordic market.

April 2026 Blog Roll

March 2026 Blog Roll

Popular Post